🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."